Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Rationale Quest - All decisions should be made at the lowest level possible- (Subsidiarity)

 
Explore the latent response of philosophy and philosophy to the global economic arena. Early posts include the study of heresies in the early church and the problems of Liberalism and Raw Capitalism in our times

Yet another defense of my Spectator op-ed

March 15th 2007 22:10
I hope this is the last I blog about the Parker case for awhile; this is supposed to be a politics blog, not just a gun one.

However, the Spectator has another reader letter, this time from David Gonzalez of Illinois:

In his piece on the recent Parker decision, Robert VerBruggen observes: "The ruling makes no issue of the fact Miller and Layton were not militia members. Rather, Miller and Layton failed to prove a militia might use a sawed-off shotgun."

My readings on the Miller decision indicate that, before the case could be heard, both men skipped bail, disappeared, and eventually were found dead. The case for militia utility of a short-barreled shotgun (called a "trench gun" by doughboys in WWI) wasn't proven because it wasn't argued. The solicitor general, in effect, got a free shot and won by default.


First of all, I mentioned the legally relevant part of this -- that no one represented Layton and Miller -- in the original piece. In fact, that statement occurred in the fourth paragraph, where the line Gonzalez cites is in the ninth, so I'm sure he read it or skipped over it.

Two, it seems his facts are wrong. I left my copy of Supreme Court Gun Cases in Wisconsin, and that would have been an authoritative source, but both Wikipedia and Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership agree that while Miller died, Layton plead guilty after the decision.

Wikipedia:

"(B)y the time of the Supreme Court decision, Miller had been killed, and Layton made a plea bargain after the decision was handed down."

Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership:

"[O]n 15 May 1939 the Court over-turned District Court Judge Ragon's decision to quash the indictment of Miller and Layton. On 12 June 1939 Chief Justice Charles E. Hughes issued an order conveying the Supreme Court's decision to Judge Ragon. That order was received on 14 June 1939. However, the District Court docket shows that on 17 June 1939, Jack Miller was reported to be dead; the prosecution of him was dropped. On 8 January 1940 Frank Layton entered a plea of 'guilty' and was placed on probation for five years."

By Robert VerBruggen

51
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
493 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Tapsearch Com Editor's Blogs

10717 Vote(s)
74 Comment(s)
156 Post(s)
15491 Vote(s)
142 Comment(s)
240 Post(s)
10945 Vote(s)
156 Comment(s)
174 Post(s)
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]