Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Rationale Quest - All decisions should be made at the lowest level possible- (Subsidiarity)

 
Explore the latent response of philosophy and philosophy to the global economic arena. Early posts include the study of heresies in the early church and the problems of Liberalism and Raw Capitalism in our times

Why discrimination isn't incriminating

September 17th 2007 22:00
I've been defending the concept of discrimination for a long time, and a new Reason article says it well:

To say that someone was discriminating was once a compliment. It meant he was a man of taste, the sort of person who could see fine gradations in value and parse the good from the bad.

In later years, discrimination became a dirty word -- inverted from it its original sense to mean someone who separated people into unfair and irrelevant categories and the treated some of them badly for no good reason at all.

51
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Damo

September 17th 2007 23:32
Interesting quote.

I have no idea who reason online are nor whether they have an agenda or not.
However the words used to make the point are using two completely seperate contexts to justify one argument.

Disciminating has serveral meaning from the innocent to the oppressive. In essence the word is neutral but the context is not.

Discrimination has the same problem but the overwhelming useage to describe policies of prejudice.

I suspect th author may have been trying to blur the meaning between the two words.

Comment by Robert V

September 17th 2007 23:48
Actually, they aren't two different words, or two different concepts. To discriminate is to perceive and act on differences between options. Both of these are examples.

You're right, of course, that one can discriminate for good as well as bad reasons. The whole point is that "discrimination" used to automatically evoke good decisionmaking. Now it calls up thoughts of knee-jerk, racist reactions. Discrimination as a concept has suffered because some people misuse it and others define it too narrowly.

Comment by Damo

September 18th 2007 01:48
My point was not be semantic but rather to point out that the semantics of a word can totally change its meaning.

The propaganda was considered a neutral word before WW1 but after it was tarnished.

Thus you cannot use the word today without it triggering emotion in many quaters.

Discrimination has similar bagage due to historical events creating the negative association with the word.

That is all I wanted say really.
Not a very big point but a point all the same.

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
493 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Tapsearch Com Editor's Blogs

10717 Vote(s)
74 Comment(s)
156 Post(s)
15491 Vote(s)
142 Comment(s)
240 Post(s)
10945 Vote(s)
156 Comment(s)
174 Post(s)
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]