Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

The Rationale Quest - All decisions should be made at the lowest level possible- (Subsidiarity)

 
Explore the latent response of philosophy and philosophy to the global economic arena. Early posts include the study of heresies in the early church and the problems of Liberalism and Raw Capitalism in our times

Traffic shootings: The exception that proves the rule

March 21st 2007 00:05
Every time a state legislature debates letting their citizens carry concealed weapons, someone inevitably brings up a scenario where two people get into an accident, and one of them gets so mad he shoots the other.

But as John Lott once said:

"Despite millions of people licensed to carry concealed handguns and many states having these laws for decades, there has only been one case where a person with a permit used a gun after a traffic accident and even in that one case it was in self-defense."

Well, make that two, and this time it's an aggravated response to tailgating. From the Free Press:

"Police say that Headd pulled her 1993 Chevrolet Cavalier alongside the pickup as the two vehicles traveled down I-94 in Harrison Township last month.

"She then grabbed the 9mm pistol she's been licensed to carry for nine years, pointed it out of the window and fired at the tires of the truck driven by a New Baltimore man, police say."

The fact it made national news further signifies how rare this is. And even this didn't hurt anyone:

"Law enforcement officials say there's no excuse: What if the stray bullet hit someone?"

Of course, in terms of personal behavior. But statistically, the relevant fact is that it didn't. So to date, no one has died or been injured by a concealed carry permit holder after a car accident.

By Robert VerBruggen

61
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
subscribe to this blog 


   

   


Comments
3 Comments. [ Add A Comment ]

Comment by Cibbuano

March 21st 2007 01:29
It confuses me because I don't see the value out of carrying a concealed weapon. Why? for protection?


Comment by Robert V

March 21st 2007 01:34
Yes, for protection. There is good evidence that allowing concealed weapons actually reduced crime (see Lott's "More Guns, Less Crime"), and at the very least, it does not increase crime (see the National Academies of Science report).

Comment by D. Armenta

March 21st 2007 03:30
Hum, well..I guess it would have to be "all or nothing". An Alaskan man told me once that there was no crime in his town because *everyone* was packing a gun and everyone knew it. On the other hand, if no one had guns, I suppose that mankind, ornery creatures that we are, would just find some other way to kill each other off..

Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
3 Posts
3 Posts
493 Posts dating from December 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Tapsearch Com Editor's Blogs

10717 Vote(s)
74 Comment(s)
156 Post(s)
15491 Vote(s)
142 Comment(s)
240 Post(s)
10945 Vote(s)
156 Comment(s)
174 Post(s)
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]