Tapsearch Com EditorMore on Duke
April 12th 2007 22:10
It's funny how the media has been covering the Duke lacrosse case. Liberal bias explains why they're still not letting out the false accuser's name (Crystal Gail Mangum) -- though it's arguable the woman's troubled enough as it is.
What I'm surprised about, though, is that none of the retrospectives I've seen have pointed to an e-mail one of the players sent shortly after the stripper left. It read:
By Robert VerBruggen
What I'm surprised about, though, is that none of the retrospectives I've seen have pointed to an e-mail one of the players sent shortly after the stripper left. It read:
To whom it may concern
tommrow night, after tonights show, ive decided to have some strippers over to edens 2c. all are welcome.. however there will be no nudity. i plan on killing the b[-]tches as soon as the walk in and proceding to cut their skin off while c[---]ing in my duke issue spandex.. all in besides arch and tack please respond
41
Now, the names the accuser gave did not match his. But this does give a reason to suspect him, and it explains why the DA behaved the way he did -- at first. Of course, when all the other evidence came out Nifong should have backed down, but this case wasn't the right-from-the-start clearly-wrong situation some in the conservative media portray it as. It's great the tide has turned in the players' favor, but let's not act like they weren't pretty irresponsible.tommrow night, after tonights show, ive decided to have some strippers over to edens 2c. all are welcome.. however there will be no nudity. i plan on killing the b[-]tches as soon as the walk in and proceding to cut their skin off while c[---]ing in my duke issue spandex.. all in besides arch and tack please respond
41
By Robert VerBruggen
| 45 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
subscribe to this blog
